Planned Gifts Reported as Most Successful Funding Method |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
A report recently released by the Center
on Philanthropy at Indiana University indicates that planned giving is
the most effective form of fund raising in today’s environment.
The “Philanthropic Giving Index” for December 2002 was sponsored in
part by the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP) and the
Association for Healthcare Philanthropy (AHP). The report
summarizes the findings of a survey of a representative selection of
nonprofits and consultants chosen to represent a cross-section of the
nonprofit sector. Overall, respondents were less optimistic
than in the past about prospects for success in fundraising in the
current environment. The Philanthropic Giving Index (PGI) was 77.7
in December 2002, the lowest level since the index was first published
and down significantly from its peak of 94.6 in December 1999.
Despite current pessimism, however, respondents were much more
optimistic about prospects for the next six months with an Expectations
Index (EI) of 85.8. The survey sheds significant light on the
impact of the events of September 11th and indicates that current
economic conditions appear to be having a more negative impact on
expectations for giving, as the PGI is now lower than it was in the wake
of the events of the fall of 2001. Importance of Planned Giving Other findings of the report are important for those responsible for planned gift development efforts for their organizations and institutions. When asked what fundraising techniques were most successful in today’s environment, planned giving and major gifts were rated by the most development executives surveyed as the most successful methods, followed closely by direct mail.
The findings varied somewhat depending on
the type of organization, its size, and the scope of its activities. Those sectors that reported the most
reliance on the success of planned and major gift efforts were
education, religion, healthcare, human services, and public
benefit/environmental causes. National and regionally-based
organizations reported the most success with planned giving as a source
of funding, while those more locally based were somewhat less optimistic
about this funding methodology. Overall, organizations in the under $1
million revenue range, the $1 million to $10 million range, and the over
$10 million group all reported that planned giving was currently the
most successful fundraising technique they employed. There are a number of reasons why planned giving is a resilient source of income during difficult economic periods:
Carefully managing the increased interest in planned gifts among donors can help assure that the maximum benefits accrue to your organization in the shortest period of time. It is vital to make certain that the
right gift opportunities are exposed to the right segment of donors at
the appropriate point in their natural lifecycle of giving. There
are many ways to give where the gift is not completed immediately, but
where benefits are not necessarily deferred until the death of
relatively young persons. The Indiana University Center on Philanthropy Giving Index is a valuable tool that can serve to guide nonprofit executives in focusing their efforts where they may be most effective at a given point in time. The Philanthropic Giving Index now indicates that it may be especially prudent to make sure that efforts to encourage planned gifts are in place and positioned to provide maximum funding for your institution in an efficient and cost-effective manner. This report is the latest information
that indicates that planned giving is to some extent counter cyclical
and may hold greater importance during challenging economic
periods. To view “Philanthropy in Uncertain Times,” published
in Trusts & Estates magazine in March 2002, CLICK
HERE. For more information and a link to the complete Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University report, visit www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/PGI-Dec2002.pdf. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||