|
Gifts
for All Seasons
by Robert F. Sharpe, Jr.
In recent weeks much has
been written about the lackluster performance of stock markets
in 2000.
What has the impact of softer
markets been on charitable giving in general and planned giving
in particular? Early reports for the last quarter of 2000 are
spotty with some organizations and institutions reporting mixed
results, particularly in receipts of stock gifts. Others are reporting
record years, particularly in bequest receipts and in newly funded
gift annuities and charitable remainder trusts.
In this article we will
examine how different planned giving prospect groups may react
to changing economic conditions.
Younger planned gift
donors
Donors in the youngest segment
of traditional planned gift donors persons aged 55 to 65 may
have been among the most heavily affected group in terms of reductions
in asset values. In this age group, pre-retirement for most, assets
tend to be invested more heavily in equities, with more participation
in investments with higher growth and risk potential.
Many donors in this age
group may have securities that have decreased in value since they
have owned them, but still have gains that would translate into
capital gains tax liability if sold. Donors with outstanding pledges
should be reminded that from a tax planning standpoint it may
be better to give securities that still have any gain in them
rather than make gifts of cash. Cash can be used to repurchase
the same securities and thus enjoy a higher cost basis and less
gain when stock prices recover in the future.
Deferred gift annuities
and trusts that feature relatively high payouts for a short term
of years may be appealing to the 55-to-65-year-old donors as well.
Such gifts can be a way to lock in a higher income today while
enjoying income tax savings and diversification that can be achieved
without sacrificing a portion of their remaining asset values
in capital gains taxes.
Older planned gift donors
For donors in the 65- to
75-age group, different plans may be in order. As donors in this
age range tend to be retired and more heavily invested in bonds
and old economy stocks, they may actually have seen
increases in their net worth over the past year, although
not in the magnitude of prior years. For persons who hold a significant
portion of their investment portfolio in bonds, lower interest
rates in recent months may have led to increases in the value
of that portion of their portfolio. Now may be a good time to
remind such donors that charitable remainder trusts for life,
current and deferred gift annuities, and other traditional planned
giving tools may offer attractive opportunities to diversify their
holdings in a tax-free manner while enjoying income tax deductions
and what may be a generous flow of income.
Expect gift annuities and
charitable remainder annuity trusts to be of greater interest
to this and other age groups than in recent years. Remembering
the old adage that a bird in the hand is worth two in the
bush, a 70-year-old may find a fixed income for life of
7% to be more attractive than a 5% or 6% unitrust that may or
may not offer growth in income in coming years. In times of lower
interest rates, a larger percentage of income from annuity trusts
may be reported by the donor at more favorable capital gains tax
rates under the tier structure of reporting income from such trusts.
Discussions of reduced estate
and gift taxes may also call more attention to the income element
of planned gifts and lead to more interest in establishing such
gifts during life rather than as part of more long-range estate
planning.
Despite periodic fluctuations
in asset values, donors in the older age range will continue to
make their estate plans. Many will continue to experience the
desire to give something back through charitable bequests
and similar gifts. As retirement plan assets comprise ever larger
percentages of assets of older Americans, it is important to keep
reminding such persons that bequests via retirement
plans can offer special benefits in the form of increased tax
savings when compared to traditional bequests via the will.
Meeting needs of oldest
donors
Donors in the over-75 range
may have experienced the least decline in asset values and may
have benefited the most from increases in bond prices as interest
rates have trended down. On the other hand, as donors in this
age range may depend most heavily on fixed income investments
for their income, lower interest rates may have led to less spendable
income, especially for those who have invested in money markets
and short-term bond funds. The current environment may thus be
the best for charitable gift annuity programs since the early
1990s. Dont overlook the attractiveness of deferred gift annuities
to older donors who are willing to delay income from their annuities
for a few years in return for higher rates in later years when
they may need the income the most.
For those in their late
seventies or older, remember that charitable remainder annuity
trusts for the life of one or more persons may be structured with
higher rates with relatively little risk to principal. For example,
a charitable remainder annuity trust funded with $100,000 in assets
can pay a rate of 10% for 10 years with an expected remainder
in the range of $50,000. This might be a very attractive way for
an older person to structure a significant gift while returning
income equal to the entire $100,000 over a 10-year period along
with an immediate income tax deduction of approximately $30,000.
As in the case of those
in younger age ranges, estate planning will continue unbated by
those who are increasingly aware of their mortality. Bequests
and similar gifts are typically made by those in their late seventies
who die in their early to mid-eighties. Successful programs will
continue to take steps to assure that their organizations are
top of mind when such persons are working with their advisors
to make what may be their final estate plans.
An abundance of cash
Regardless of age, many
donors now have more cash than in recent years as they have shifted
a portion of their assets out of more volatile stocks and into
investments that are more liquid.
For the wealthy, certain
plans may prove more attractive under these circumstances. Charitable
lead trusts, for example, may hold increased attractiveness with
discount rates under 7%. For those who have significant amounts
of cash they would like to pass to loved ones tax-free and who
also have sufficient income from other sources, lead trusts can
be a wonderful way to leave assets to others while making a charitable
gift.
Donors with significant
amounts of cash may also be encouraged to satisfy outstanding
pledges with gifts that would be subject to a 50% of income limitation
rather than the more restrictive 30% limitation for gifts of appreciated
assets.
Gifts for all seasons
Planned gift arrangements
are amazingly flexible vehicles. Plans that were appropriate in
recent years may lose some attractiveness while others that may
have been dormant of late may come to the fore. A
little time spent today adjusting our thinking, and our approaches
to donors and their advisors, will, as in the past, pay tremendous
dividends in increased gift income both now and in future
years.
Next
|